Exactly
david jencks
On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 02:38 AM, gianny DAMOUR wrote:
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
djencks 2004/01/14 00:28:33
[...]
I'm a little confused with the change. Why are the methods if they do
nothing but pass a request along to its non-abstract superclass
(ReadOnlyContext class)?
I just had a look to that and I think that these GerContext methods
are duplicated in order to be synchronized.
ReadOnlyContext, the super-class of GerContext, is a read-only
context, which was intended to be initialized only once via
internalBind.
GerContext is a read-write context (actually the "write" part is still
performed via the internalBind instead of the standard binding
operation), which can be used concurrently - and hence the
introduction of these synchronizations.
Cheers,
Gianny
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous !
http://search.msn.fr/
