Right, I think that's the only part of the build that hasn't been teased out yet. Will fix that, thanks.
-p


At 04:42 PM 3/31/2004 +0900, Ias wrote:
Thanks for your great work. I just feel like introducing it to my article in
May issue of Microsoftware, a Korean journal for software developers.

By the way, I actually failed to build JAM first. I figured it out by adding

    <ant dir='..' target='jsr173_api.jar' inheritAll='false' />

to jsr173 target in build.xml for JAM. (I guess it was also because I hadn't
built xmlbeans before building JAM.)

Regards,

Ias

=========================================================
Lee, Changshin (Korean name)
Ias (International name)
               Company Web Site: http://www.tmax.co.kr
               Personal Web Site: http://www.iasandcb.pe.kr
---------------------------------------------------------
JSR 201, 204, 222 and 224 Expert Group Member
Apache Web Services Project Member
R&D Center
Tmax Soft, Inc.
=========================================================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Calahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 12:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: JAM: Java API for Metadata
>
> Hello everyone.  I am a committer on Xml-Beans, another
> project currently in the Apache Incubator.  As part of my
> work there, I have developed an API for representing Java
> types and their associated metadata which I believe would be
> of general use to the community.
>
> The API is called 'JAM' - the Java API for Metadata.  On the
> surface, it looks quite a bit like Reflection or the Doclet
> API, but it affords a greater level of flexibility and
> convenience, and in particular provides solutions for a
> number of thorny problems posed by JSR175.
>
> I have had a few discussions with some folks on
> [email protected] about possibly spinning JAM up
> as an independent project from xbeans.  It was suggested that
> it would be useful to test the waters in some other projects
> such as Geronimo to see if JAM would indeed be generally
> useful.  So, here I am testing. :)
>
> Anyway, if you want more gory details, I have temporarily
> posted some white papers and the API docs here:
>
> http://www.pcal.net/jam
>
> Any feedback is more than welcome.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Patrick
>



Reply via email to