Hi, > >>From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >>Can someone give us a quick update on where JMX Remoting is > with the > >>new network transport (not RMI) ? > > > > What JMX Remoting are you speaking of? > > > > The ability to invoke an MBean from another VM using the Geronimo > network code as transport (using its security etc.). Does > this work, or is there much to do to make it work ?
Is this stuff what we talked some time ago with Hiram ? After few mails I saw no more activity, so I presumed it was kinda dead. MX4J provides JSR 160 implementations over RMI/JRMP, RMI/IIOP and HTTP/SOAP, it's only a matter of configuration. The layer can be written using JSR 160 API, and plugin later the geronimo protocol. About security, it is something more peculiar so that RMI/SSL is not secure enough ? I don't know if that stuff builds on MX4J base classes, but FWIW there are in mx4j.tools.remote.* base classes that save lots of coding to make a connector be JSR 160 compliant. I can provide guidelines/help writing that if needed (but little spare time in this period). Cheers Simon
