Exactly. The tens of thousands of Eclipse users will be in familiar territory.
But to be on the safe-side, did pull together a list of 62 "haves" and "have nots" to be absolutely clear on what we are giving people. If we have any energy to spend, let's spend it there. I'd prefer not to make the 0.x initial release mistake again :) -David On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:55:01PM -0400, Dion Almaer wrote: > Although.... If people think about Eclipse they will expect: > > "Ahh ok, so there will be another 9 of these, and EACH ONE will break > anything I was doing in it before" > > ;) > > Dion > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 2:52 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Just a quick remark about naming of the release > > > > Dain mentioned that the release will be called "1.0M1". I > > wanted to voice concern that calling it "1.0" is going to > > make people think it's very close to shippable as a 1.0. > > > > If that's the case, great - go for it. > > > > If not and you see some significant time yet to be spent > > before it being "1.0"-ish, then I think the project would > > ensure some 'slack' if it were just called "M1" or something > > as it should keep user's expectations reasonable. > > > > Just my 0.02. This concern of mine is no way intended to > > stand in the way of whatever is in process - just wanted to > > speak up before it's too late. > > > > geir > > > > -- > > Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > >
