Attention is currently required from: fixeria.

dexter has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32734 )

Change subject: paging: do not confirm PAGING COMMAND messages
......................................................................


Patch Set 7:

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS6:
> IMO, it does not worth to introduce such a layering violation (i.e. […]
In osmo-bsc we also distinguish between PAGING COMMAND and IMMEDIATE 
ASSIGNMENT. and it is done in the same way: 
https://gitea.osmocom.org/cellular-infrastructure/osmo-bsc/src/branch/master/src/osmo-bsc/pcu_sock.c#L557

(If you think looking directly in the MAC block is a problem then we might 
consider adding a message type field to struct gsm_pcu_if_pch_dt)

The reason why I think that this must be fixed is the following: When we 
confirm PAGING COMMAND messages as well, then this has the appearance that it 
would be mandatory to confirm PAGING COMMAND messages. This has caused 
confusion in the past and we should make sure that we won't run into this 
again. Also since osmo-bsc does not confirm PAGING COMMAND messages we would 
end up having two different behaviors.



-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32734
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8b8264d28b1b1deb08774cdba58dd4c6dafe115d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32734
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pma...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 15:33:12 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to