Attention is currently required from: arehbein.

pespin has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31880?usp=email )

Change subject: Make NSE timing data configurable
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(5 comments)

Patchset:

PS2:
Again this should be per BTS.


File include/osmocom/bsc/bts.h:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31880/comment/81c13d98_bee9d723
PS2, Line 326: #define GSM_BTS_TDEF_ID_TNS_BLOCK_NEG29          (-29)
Better leave some space in the number series so that we can later on add 
similar timers next to the existing ones.


File src/osmo-bsc/bts_ipaccess_nanobts_omlattr.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31880/comment/cb9190bc_b2e5811e
PS2, Line 187:  struct osmo_tdef *tdefs = bts->network->T_defs;
Again, this needs to be per BTS.


File src/osmo-bsc/bts_vty.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31880/comment/bf555dbd_2e2108c9
PS2, Line 76: static const int gprs_ns_timer_tdef_data[][2] = {
AFAICT this is only used in cfg_bts_gprs_ns_timer_cmd, so it can be moved there.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31880/comment/63253556_aa03e90e
PS2, Line 1627:         int idx = get_string_value(gprs_ns_timer_strs, argv[0]);
so you are converting to an index here once, and in line 1637 again. This looks 
ptoentially wrong. Why isn't this get_string_value providing the interesting 
idx directly?



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31880?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie46ec5cb7095bc1dfe3effd0e76d6ccfd6bd2f3f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31880
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehb...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <arehb...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:50:54 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to