Attention is currently required from: daniel, laforge, pespin. arehbein has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34743?usp=email )
Change subject: gsmtap_util: Use Osmo IO instead of Osmo write queues ...................................................................... Patch Set 5: (1 comment) File src/core/gsmtap_util.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34743/comment/c7aff446_40c571ac PS5, Line 478: osmo_iofd_setup(gti, gti->sink_fd, "gsmtap_inst.out", OSMO_IO_FD_MODE_READ_WRITE, &gsmtap_sink_ops, NULL); I have (for now) fixed the memleak keeping Osmo IO, since it was a quick fix and I'm not entirely I understand what you mean by > simply never read from that fd and just keep it open there so no ICMP errors > are sent ? I would think it means returning after the `fd = gsmtap_source_add_sink_fd(gsmtap_inst_fd2(gti));` line in `gsmtap_source_add_sink()`, but then I wouldn't understand why the call to `read()` was added to the Osmo FD callback in the original code. I can of course also just go back to what the code did before (regarding sink functionality), but I thought I'd ask, since you mentioned these two options. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34743?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iadbbef74e3add7001d84dd6b68f51eac293e44d0 Gerrit-Change-Number: 34743 Gerrit-PatchSet: 5 Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehb...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillm...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillm...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 13:51:16 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: daniel <dwillm...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment
