Attention is currently required from: neels. pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35180?usp=email )
Change subject: socket: Introduce API osmo_sock_multiaddr_get_name_buf() ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (5 comments) File src/core/socket.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35180/comment/ec1feec8_ff7c2583 PS1, Line 1968: return -EBADF; > i understand, but for the snprintf() like function signature, if at all > possible you should always r […] Ack https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35180/comment/1411b96c_cca4890e PS1, Line 1993: v6 = !!s > assigning a value to is_v6 in an 'else' clause and using is_v6 below. […] I only care about checking if the address is ipv6 in the case where we only have 1 IP, because in that case I need to put "[]" around it to separate it from the port number. If there's more than 1, no need, because everything is already enclosed in "()". So by doing it here I avoid doing a lookup in a string unless it's strictly needed. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35180/comment/489652e3_5bf0d19e PS1, Line 2005: OSMO_STRBUF_PRINTF(sb, "<need-more-bufs!>"); > (could print this above instead of adding the need_more_bufs local var, just > my opinion) […] I could write an entire novel explaining the error there, but have that token printed and looking at the code already quickly explains what's going on. I want to print it here because at least is provides as many addresses as it can fit. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35180/comment/ad4d2b6d_0d053a6e PS1, Line 2019: bool is_v6 = false; > (can this code dup be collapsed with the above, maybe with a static func?) It could, I'd need to pass the sb as a param and so on, and I'm not sure if the macros can use an sb pointer.... https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35180/comment/4852c8d4_24954207 PS1, Line 2052: int osmo_sock_get_name_buf(char *str, size_t str_len, int fd) > my first thought is "yes, sounds good". […] I prefer keeping the multiaddr prefix instead of a "2", we already use it in several places. This way code knowing only to be handling single address protocols can keep using it. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35180?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I48950754ed6f61ee5ffa04a447fab8903f10acc0 Gerrit-Change-Number: 35180 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: neels <nhofm...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofm...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 15:33:59 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofm...@sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment
