Attention is currently required from: daniel, jolly, pespin.

laforge has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/36062?usp=email )

Change subject: osmo_io: Change struct osmo_io_ops to contain struct, not union
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS1:
> I think I already provided my opinion on this previously, I see no need to 
> change it to struct, but  […]
I would say over half of the problems in this patchset I saw the last few days 
were related to this being a union.  Now those have been resolved, but I see 
potential for more of those problems in the future.  So better be safe than to 
optimize for 4-5 * sizeof(unsigned long).  If we really need to conserve 
memory, struct osmo_io_fd should simply point to the io_ops, rather than 
copying it into each and every osmo_fd.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/36062?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9d302df8d00369e7b30437a52deb205f75882be3
Gerrit-Change-Number: 36062
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillm...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: jolly <andr...@eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andr...@eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillm...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:07:24 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to