tempest has uploaded this change for review. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/41230?usp=email )


Change subject: Fix tx/rx-sps 4 for USRP1 devices
......................................................................

Fix tx/rx-sps 4 for USRP1 devices

In Transceiver52M/device/usrp1/USRPDevice.cpp, the existing code sets the 
pingOffset variable to -7231(269 - 7500) with tx-sps = 4. The (apparent) 
correct value for pingOffset for tx/rx-sps 4 is 272.
While I'm not completely sure how this patch works to fix the increased sps 
value, my theory is that(as seen in the block comment on lines 72-77) OpenBTS, 
where this code is adapted from, only supported a split sps setup(tx-sps=4, 
rx_sps=1 for sps=4), which created a differing decimation rate between Tx and 
Rx on the board. In this case, apparently you needed to account for an advance 
in the timestamp for a correct output.
However, in the case tx_sps == rx_sps, the decimation/sample rates will be the 
same, and(I guess) this advance doesn't need to be accounted for. I also had to 
change a line in the initialization of the Rx end of the USRP device to allow 
it to have a correct decimation rate when the sps values are 4.
Furthermore, I commented out the line that would create different pingOffset 
values for split sps values, since osmo-trx won't allow nonequal values for 
tx-sps and rx-sps. I left it visible in the file for reference however.

Tested and working(with EDGE!) on the URAN-1, a clone of the USRP1 designed for 
GSM applications.

Change-Id: Ie5263b6fd00c2bf18bd1132355aeebd9b4d9ffda
---
M Transceiver52M/device/usrp1/USRPDevice.cpp
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)



  git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-trx refs/changes/30/41230/1

diff --git a/Transceiver52M/device/usrp1/USRPDevice.cpp 
b/Transceiver52M/device/usrp1/USRPDevice.cpp
index 63a9bcc..fcd60c4 100644
--- a/Transceiver52M/device/usrp1/USRPDevice.cpp
+++ b/Transceiver52M/device/usrp1/USRPDevice.cpp
@@ -75,18 +75,19 @@
    * split sample rate Tx/Rx - 4/1 sps we need to need to
    * compensate for advance rather than delay.
    */
-  if (tx_sps == 1)
-    pingOffset = 272;
-  else if (tx_sps == 4)
-    pingOffset = 269 - 7500;
-  else
-    pingOffset = 0;
+  pingOffset = 272;
+
+/* Split SPS (4/1) unsupported on USRP1
+  if(tx_sps == 4 && rx_sps == 1)
+     pingOffset = 269 - 7500;
+*/

 #ifdef SWLOOPBACK
   samplePeriod = 1.0e6/actualSampleRate;
   loopbackBufferSize = 0;
   gettimeofday(&lastReadTime,NULL);
   firstRead = false;
+  pingOffset = 0;
 #endif
 }

@@ -101,7 +102,7 @@
   m_uRx.reset();
   try {
     m_uRx = usrp_standard_rx_sptr(usrp_standard_rx::make(
-                                        0, decimRate * tx_sps, 1, -1,
+                                        0, decimRate, 1, -1,
                                         usrp_standard_rx::FPGA_MODE_NORMAL,
                                         1024, 16 * 8, rbf));
     m_uRx->set_fpga_master_clock_freq(masterClockRate);

--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/41230?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email

Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Project: osmo-trx
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie5263b6fd00c2bf18bd1132355aeebd9b4d9ffda
Gerrit-Change-Number: 41230
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: tempest <[email protected]>

Reply via email to