Harald Welte has submitted this change and it was merged. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9471 )

Change subject: msc/USSD: test USSD-request during an active call
......................................................................

msc/USSD: test USSD-request during an active call

The idea of this testcase is to check if MSC can correctly
handle a USSD-request during an active call.

What we do here:

  1) Perform Location Update
  2) Establish a MT-call
  3) Perform *#100# request
  4) Release the call

Change-Id: Ifa3cd1aeeb34ccf5864f78b76a88aaa6d5e51839
---
M msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn
M msc/expected-results.xml
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Approvals:
  Jenkins Builder: Verified
  Harald Welte: Looks good to me, approved



diff --git a/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn b/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn
index 7b8740c..3316563 100644
--- a/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn
+++ b/msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn
@@ -2216,6 +2216,73 @@
        vc_conn.done;
 }

+/* LU followed by MT call and USSD request during this call */
+private function f_tc_lu_and_ussd_during_call(charstring id, BSC_ConnHdlrPars 
pars)
+runs on BSC_ConnHdlr {
+       f_init_handler(pars);
+
+       /* Call parameters taken from f_tc_lu_and_mt_call */
+       var CallParameters cpars := valueof(t_CallParams('123456'H, 0));
+       cpars.mgcp_connection_id_bss := '10004'H;
+       cpars.mgcp_connection_id_mss := '10005'H;
+       cpars.mgcp_ep := "rtpbridge/1@mgw";
+       cpars.bss_rtp_port := 1110;
+
+       /* Perform location update */
+       f_perform_lu();
+
+       /* Establish a MT call */
+       f_mt_call_establish(cpars);
+
+       /* Hold the call for some time */
+       f_sleep(1.0);
+
+       /* Compose a new SS/REGISTER message with request */
+       var template (value) PDU_ML3_MS_NW ussd_req := ts_ML3_MO_SS_REGISTER(
+               tid := 1, /* We just need a single transaction */
+               ti_flag := c_TIF_ORIG, /* Sent from the side that originates 
the TI */
+               facility := f_USSD_FACILITY_IE_INVOKE(
+                       op_code := SS_OP_CODE_PROCESS_USS_REQ,
+                       ussd_string := "*#100#"
+               )
+       );
+
+       /* Compose SS/RELEASE_COMPLETE template with expected response */
+       var template PDU_ML3_NW_MS ussd_rsp := tr_ML3_MT_SS_RELEASE_COMPLETE(
+               tid := 1, /* Response should arrive within the same transaction 
*/
+               ti_flag := c_TIF_REPL, /* Sent to the side that originates the 
TI */
+               facility := f_USSD_FACILITY_IE_RETURN_RESULT(
+                       op_code := SS_OP_CODE_PROCESS_USS_REQ,
+                       ussd_string := "Your extension is " & 
hex2str(g_pars.msisdn) & "\r"
+               )
+       );
+
+       /* Request own number request */
+       BSSAP.send(ts_PDU_DTAP_MO(ussd_req));
+       alt {
+       /* We expect RELEASE_COMPLETE message with the response */
+       [] BSSAP.receive(tr_PDU_DTAP_MT(ussd_rsp)) {
+               setverdict(pass);
+               }
+       [] BSSAP.receive {
+               setverdict(fail, "Unknown/unexpected BSSAP received");
+               self.stop;
+               }
+       }
+
+       /* Hold the call for some time */
+       f_sleep(1.0);
+
+       /* Release the call (does Clear Complete itself) */
+       f_call_hangup(cpars, true);
+}
+testcase TC_lu_and_ussd_during_call() runs on MTC_CT {
+       var BSC_ConnHdlr vc_conn;
+       f_init();
+       vc_conn := f_start_handler(refers(f_tc_lu_and_ussd_during_call), 48);
+       vc_conn.done;
+}
+
 /* TODO (SMS):
    * different user data lengths
    * SMPP transaction mode with unsuccessful delivery
@@ -2299,6 +2366,7 @@

        execute( TC_lu_and_ussd_single_req() );
        execute( TC_lu_and_ussd_wrong_code() );
+       execute( TC_lu_and_ussd_during_call() );

        /* Run this last: at the time of writing this test crashes the MSC */
        execute( TC_lu_imsi_auth_tmsi_encr_3_1_log_msc_debug() );
diff --git a/msc/expected-results.xml b/msc/expected-results.xml
index 69f2e28..ba40519 100644
--- a/msc/expected-results.xml
+++ b/msc/expected-results.xml
@@ -73,4 +73,5 @@
   <testcase classname='MSC_Tests' 
name='TC_lu_imsi_auth_tmsi_encr_3_1_log_msc_debug' time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='MSC_Tests' name='TC_lu_and_ussd_single_req' 
time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='MSC_Tests' name='TC_lu_and_ussd_wrong_code' 
time='MASKED'/>
+  <testcase classname='MSC_Tests' name='TC_lu_and_ussd_during_call' 
time='MASKED'/>
 </testsuite>

--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9471
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifa3cd1aeeb34ccf5864f78b76a88aaa6d5e51839
Gerrit-Change-Number: 9471
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Vadim Yanitskiy <axilira...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <lafo...@gnumonks.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vadim Yanitskiy <axilira...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to