osmith has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12488
Change subject: Cosmetic: GSUP: note "on wire" for imei_result
......................................................................
Cosmetic: GSUP: note "on wire" for imei_result
Note that OSMO_GSUP_IMEI_RESULT_ACK is 0 on the wire, although the
enum value is 1. Same with NACK (1 on wire, enum 2).
I had implemented enum osmo_gsup_imei_result after
enum osmo_gsup_cancel_type above, where this comment exists as well,
and I incorrectly assumed that enum osmo_gsup_cn_domain in the middle
was also implemented this way and therefore adding the comments to each
enum would be redundant. But for cn_domain, the values on the wire are
the same as the enum values.
Change-Id: If97c34f117bfaab2232bbb625e9d118c8f390e58
---
M include/osmocom/gsm/gsup.h
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmocore refs/changes/88/12488/1
diff --git a/include/osmocom/gsm/gsup.h b/include/osmocom/gsm/gsup.h
index 6adb0bf..5dc2a82 100644
--- a/include/osmocom/gsm/gsup.h
+++ b/include/osmocom/gsm/gsup.h
@@ -174,8 +174,8 @@
};
enum osmo_gsup_imei_result {
- OSMO_GSUP_IMEI_RESULT_ACK = 1,
- OSMO_GSUP_IMEI_RESULT_NACK = 2,
+ OSMO_GSUP_IMEI_RESULT_ACK = 1, /* on wire: 0 */
+ OSMO_GSUP_IMEI_RESULT_NACK = 2, /* on wire: 1 */
};
/*! TCAP-like session state */
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12488
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Change-Id: If97c34f117bfaab2232bbb625e9d118c8f390e58
Gerrit-Change-Number: 12488
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osm...@sysmocom.de>
