osmith has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12488
Change subject: Cosmetic: GSUP: note "on wire" for imei_result ...................................................................... Cosmetic: GSUP: note "on wire" for imei_result Note that OSMO_GSUP_IMEI_RESULT_ACK is 0 on the wire, although the enum value is 1. Same with NACK (1 on wire, enum 2). I had implemented enum osmo_gsup_imei_result after enum osmo_gsup_cancel_type above, where this comment exists as well, and I incorrectly assumed that enum osmo_gsup_cn_domain in the middle was also implemented this way and therefore adding the comments to each enum would be redundant. But for cn_domain, the values on the wire are the same as the enum values. Change-Id: If97c34f117bfaab2232bbb625e9d118c8f390e58 --- M include/osmocom/gsm/gsup.h 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmocore refs/changes/88/12488/1 diff --git a/include/osmocom/gsm/gsup.h b/include/osmocom/gsm/gsup.h index 6adb0bf..5dc2a82 100644 --- a/include/osmocom/gsm/gsup.h +++ b/include/osmocom/gsm/gsup.h @@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ }; enum osmo_gsup_imei_result { - OSMO_GSUP_IMEI_RESULT_ACK = 1, - OSMO_GSUP_IMEI_RESULT_NACK = 2, + OSMO_GSUP_IMEI_RESULT_ACK = 1, /* on wire: 0 */ + OSMO_GSUP_IMEI_RESULT_NACK = 2, /* on wire: 1 */ }; /*! TCAP-like session state */ -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12488 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Change-Id: If97c34f117bfaab2232bbb625e9d118c8f390e58 Gerrit-Change-Number: 12488 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osm...@sysmocom.de>