pespin has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/16205 )

Change subject: 1/2: refactor: add and use lu_fsm, osmo_gsup_req, osmo_ipa_name
......................................................................


Patch Set 23:

1- I didn't say it was easy, yet is something really desirable.

2- I agree with keeping ipa-name as a null-terminated string. Simply add checks 
in case it's not upon receiving, but afaik it's not null terminated only on 
really old code of ours (and maybe nanobts?) which anyway is not being used 
here, and which was fixed a while ago to be null-terminated.

3- It's not only about reviewing for merge. It's a problem about discussing 
each change. It's a problem when reading the git log. It's a problem when 
bisecting. It's a problem when understanding why and how stuff was changed, and 
the implications it had. It's a problem when reverting.


--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hlr/+/16205
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-hlr
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3a8dff3d4a1cbe10d6ab08257a0138d6b2a082d9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16205
Gerrit-PatchSet: 23
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofm...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofm...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osm...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:48:32 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to