fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/21020 )
Change subject: Move BTS initial values inside bts.cpp ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1 (3 comments) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/21020/1/src/bts.cpp File src/bts.cpp: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/21020/1/src/bts.cpp@327 PS1, Line 327: bts_init Does it really make sense to have everything in a separate function? I would keep/move everything here. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/21020/1/tests/ms/MsTest.ok File tests/ms/MsTest.ok: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/21020/1/tests/ms/MsTest.ok@a22 PS1, Line 22: UNKNOWN/UNKNOWN, UL UNKNOWN/UNKNOWN LOL, the author of this unit test didn't seem to care about the expectations... https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/21020/1/tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp File tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/21020/1/tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp@a799 PS1, Line 799: 03 > IIRC it's the default CS which changed due to being correctly applied (see > also in MSTest and TbfTes […] In any case, would be nice if you document this positive side-effect in the commit message. Thanks! -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/21020 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iffd6eecb1f08bda0091f45e2ef7c9c63b42e10b3 Gerrit-Change-Number: 21020 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanits...@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <lafo...@osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lyn...@fe80.eu> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 11:13:07 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pes...@sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: lynxis lazus <lyn...@fe80.eu> Gerrit-MessageType: comment
