After looking into that, it is a bit worse than I thought. In different places of getfem, short_type, size_type and even dim_type are used for referring to element faces.
Now, I have a patch tidying this up, which makes all occurrences of faces of type short_type but it is quite extensive and it obviously changes the getfem API quite a bit. Maybe it is a good opportunity now that 4.3 release is out to commit these changes and fix any issues that may arise until the release of version 5. Any opinions? Best regards Kostas On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Konstantinos Poulios < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have just noticed that in fem_interpolation_context, element faces are > referred as size_type, while in mesh_region_visitor, short_type is used. > > One consequence of this is that the > fem_interpolation_context::is_on_face() method seems not to work at the > moment. > > I have the impression that short_type is used in most cases for referring > to element faces in getfem. Should I fix fem_interpolation_context making > it to use the short_type instead? > > Best regards > Kostas >
_______________________________________________ Getfem-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/getfem-users
