Thanks for the patch, Kostas.
On 2020-01-03 19:45, Konstantinos Poulios wrote:
just informing that this is fixed now
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=getfem%2B%2B&suite=sid
and we should include the patch
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/getfem/commit/f18aaf20fb9f2a1e497c8b2572460a0726e78f2d
to our blas/lapack in future releases of getfem.
BR
Kostas
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 6:07 PM Drew Parsons <dpars...@debian.org>
wrote:
getfem++ 5.3 builds but fails tests on 64 bit big endian machines
(for
Debian GNU/Linux),
e.g. s390x
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=getfem%2B%2B&arch=s390x&ver=5.3%2Bdfsg1-2&stamp=1576851023&raw=0
ppc64
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=getfem%2B%2B&arch=ppc64&ver=5.3%2Bdfsg1-2&stamp=1576851160&raw=0
Debian builds are summarised at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=getfem%2B%2B
This failure is with getfem++ 5.3 building with gcc-9. gemfem++ 5.2
previously passed tests built with gcc-7.
