That is my fault, sorry. I have been wondering if anyone would notice this
bug. See my message below

https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/getfem-commits/2021-05/msg00000.html

If you have the possibility to contribute a fix it would be great.

Otherwise, a workaround is to export to the older gmsh format v2, where our
implementation for reading physical regions works correctly.

Best regards
Kostas

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 5:11 PM BLANCKAERT Benjamin <
benjamin.blancka...@entpe.fr> wrote:

> Dear Getfem-users,
>
> I am working on a problem in which I have to define different materials.
> To simplify the creation of the regions, I use GMSH.
>
> In GMSH I define physical elements. These objects are suppposed to be
> recognised by getfem as regions, but in my case it does not work and I
> don't understand why.
>
> Has anyone already met this kind of problem.
>
> I transmit my .py file in which I create the mesh and then I try to
> recognise my region on getfem.
>
> I hope you would be able to help me.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
> *Blanckaert Benjamin*
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to