Michael Dunstan <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Brandon Craig > Rhodes<[email protected]> wrote: > >> 1. src/Products.PloneGetPaid/Products/PloneGetPaid/ >> 2. src/Products.PloneGetPaid/src/Products/PloneGetPaid/ >> 3. src/Products.PloneGetPaid/src/trunk/Products/PloneGetPaid/ >> 4. src/Products.PloneGetPaid/trunk/Products/PloneGetPaid/ > > I vote - Keep 1. Delete 2, 3 and 4.
And there I'd thought it was some clever scheme whose point I could not fathom. :-) Looking more closely, it appears that "/trunk/" was created by some sort of crime dog back in June, and has not been touched since then: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r2705 | [email protected] | 2009-06-25 14:43:02 -0400 (Thu, 25 Jun 2009) | 1 line Merge VariableAmountDonationsBranch r2275:2394 to trunk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Oddly enough, that branch already seems to have been merged into the project by "larubbio" in r2396 back in March, so I am not sure what was intended here. In any case, I have removed the directory from the project HEAD. Similarly, the "src/trunk" directory seems to have been created by exactly the same crime dog in r2706, but in that case he was not even kind enough to leave a commit message: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r2706 | [email protected] | 2009-06-25 15:20:38 -0400 (Thu, 25 Jun 2009) | 1 line ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I have deleted that directory with the same extreme prejudice that I showed the first one. And, wow, the whole "/src/" directory itself was created by that same r2706 that I quoted above! A single commit managed to create two concentric copies of the project inside of the project itself, meaning that each file existed in three separate instances, one directory deeper than the next. That's really something. "Bahleeted," as Strong Bad would say. Ahhhh. Now searches of the source code tree are only returning one instance of each class and function defined in PloneGetPaid, rather than four. :-) I can continue exploring now. -- Brandon Craig Rhodes [email protected] http://rhodesmill.org/brandon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "getpaid-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/getpaid-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
