Hi Greg.
Is it not the case that if you use the "Assigns" option for the
parameter, that your "set" line should have an "="
Employees(k).set = New_Employee //sets the k_th employee to be
the new one
Russ
On Jun 24, 2006, at 3:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a class, say EmployeeClass, with a method SET which sets
one to be
another. (In fact someone from this list suggested this scheme
originally!)
Employees(k).set New_Employee //sets the k_th employee to be
the new one
// note that Employees(k) is defined above and exists
The set method for this class actually looks like
(Parameter : Assigns C as EmployeeClass)
name = c.name
id = c.id
etc
And I have used this type of thing for two years or so succesfully.
I put
some code to do this in a new place, and it just won't compile at
all. It
highlights the "employees(k).set" part and says that no such method
exists. But it
does exist and has existed for years. I suspect this is a case of
some minor
other thing being wrong, but RB is flagging it in a confusing way.
Does anyone
have a clue as to how to make this work or what could be causing
the problem? Of
course I have tried various options without success.
thanks
Greg
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
