On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:08 AM, D P wrote:
Thank you. Worked.
I do find this to be an odd use of memory resource. I noticed
that I can still go back and use EditField1(index) and access all
properties 0 to 81. I now have an array taking up memory and the
Editfield1(index) in duplicate. Any wise member of the board know
the rational for the redundancy? Maybe it isn't?
thanks
Derek
FreeFL
not much memory though as you only have object references and not two
sets of objects
you could even remove your array if you wanted although you'd have to
change your code
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
