Salve. Da una parte mi fa quasi piacere che non abbiano argomenti migliori di questa robetta stantia, e ormai chiaramente falsa. Certo però, si potrebbe essere anche più corretti (ma si sa, da un golden partner, forse non ci si deve sorprendere troppo). Saluti!
-------- Messaggio Inoltrato -------- Hello folks, for years I have enjoyed reading Lewis Graham's "Random Points" column in the LiDAR News magazine. I usually get some novel insight or come across a thought-provoking new concept and this month's column is especially interesting. It mashes up the ongoing "LAZ clone" conflict that asks to keep LiDAR stored in "open formats" with the practically related but conceptually independent "open source" software movement. The article revives Steve Ballmers âLinux is a cancerâ mantra it talks about how the GPL license is a "time-bomb" and makes Asia Air Survey - the gold sponsor of QGIS - appear blue-eyed in their support of such a "viral license". But it is probably best you read the entire two pages for yourself. http://twitter.com/LAStools/status/610057423672471552 As Lewis' opinions are regarded highly by the LiDAR and photogrammetry industries (myself included) and as the first few paragraphs of this widely-circulated LiDAR magazine article are a complete distortion of my personal motivation on "open formats" that will directly hurt my professional reputation, I have little choice but to respond with a correction to his column. Let me know if you have any errata on Lewis' comments about the danger of open source licenses that you want me to include. Regards, Martin @rapidlasso _______________________________________________ Gfoss@lists.gfoss.it http://lists.gfoss.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gfoss Questa e' una lista di discussione pubblica aperta a tutti. I messaggi di questa lista non hanno relazione diretta con le posizioni dell'Associazione GFOSS.it. 750 iscritti al 18.3.2015
