2013/2/10 Ian Lynagh <i...@well-typed.com>: >> Do these patches seem OK? Is it fine to insist on Alex 3? I think it >> was released in 2011 so I think by now we can assume that it is >> available on all machines that will want to build GHC. > > I'll leave looking at the patches to the haddock guys, but I think that > it's reasonable to require that GHC developers have alex 3 now. If I > understand the Haskell Platform pages correctly, the last release > included alex 3.0.2, and the one before that included 3.0.1.
Thanks Max for the patches! We're happy to accept them and require alex 3. David _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs