2013/2/10 Ian Lynagh <i...@well-typed.com>:

>> Do these patches seem OK? Is it fine to insist on Alex 3? I think it
>> was released in 2011 so I think by now we can assume that it is
>> available on all machines that will want to build GHC.
>
> I'll leave looking at the patches to the haddock guys, but I think that
> it's reasonable to require that GHC developers have alex 3 now. If I
> understand the Haskell Platform pages correctly, the last release
> included alex 3.0.2, and the one before that included 3.0.1.

Thanks Max for the patches! We're happy to accept them and require alex 3.

David

_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to