These tests have been doing better than expected in the nightlies for some while.
> Unexpected failures: > perf/compiler T3064 [stat too good] (normal) > perf/compiler T3294 [stat too good] (normal) > perf/compiler T5642 [stat too good] (normal) > perf/haddock haddock.Cabal [stat too good] (normal) > perf/haddock haddock.base [stat too good] (normal) Unfortunately, fixing them is not a simple matter of shifting the ranges up, since the tests only exceed expectations on a /perf/ build, so on a normal build such as 'quick', these tests all pass normally. I could bump up the upper bounds so that the builder stops bleating about them; perhaps we could do something more complicated where the expected performance depends on what level of optimization GHC was built with (but I don't know how to implement this.) Thoughts? Cheers, Edward _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
