On 26/08/13 09:50, Jan Stolarek wrote:
I don't mind breaking these very low-level APIs.
We are breaking that API at the moment, except that you propose to break it by
chnaging type
signatures, whereas I chose to break it by changing names. So currently the
change in primops
will not go unnoticed.
So since we have to break the API anyway, why not break it in the way
that we want?
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
