Raised as issue on github: https://github.com/haskell/primitive/issues/4
On Nov 19, 2013, at 1:17 AM, Edward Z. Yang <ezy...@mit.edu> wrote: > Is this pushed? > > Edward > > Excerpts from Christiaan Baaij's message of 2013-11-15 00:04:30 -0800: >> I'm still puzzled as to how validate failed on snow leopard, but is working >> correctly on my mountain lion machine after fixing the warning in the >> primitive package. >> Ben: does validate go through on your machine after patching the primitive >> package? >> >> Here are my results for 'validate --slow': >> >> OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Thu Nov 14 14:32:18 2013 CET >> 4:15:58 spent to go through >> 3818 total tests, which gave rise to >> 14934 test cases, of which >> 3146 were skipped >> >> 145 had missing libraries >> 11465 expected passes >> 137 expected failures >> >> 0 caused framework failures >> 5 unexpected passes >> 36 unexpected failures >> >> Unexpected passes: >> codeGen/should_run cgrun071 (optllvm) >> ghci/linking T3333 (normal) >> rename/should_compile/T3103 T3103 (hpc,optasm,optllvm) >> >> Unexpected failures: >> ../../libraries/unix/tests signals004 [bad exit code] (threaded2) >> concurrent/should_run conc012 [bad exit code] (ghci) >> driver static001 [bad stderr] (normal) >> gadt type-rep [exit code non-0] >> (hpc,optasm,threaded2,dyn,optllvm) >> ghc-api/apirecomp001 apirecomp001 [bad stderr] (normal) >> lib/integer integerConstantFolding [bad stderr] (normal) >> perf/compiler T3064 [stat not good enough] (normal) >> perf/compiler T3294 [stderr mismatch] (normal) >> perf/compiler T4801 [stat too good] (normal) >> perf/compiler T5642 [stat not good enough] (normal) >> perf/haddock haddock.Cabal [stat not good enough] (normal) >> perf/haddock haddock.compiler [stat not good enough] >> (normal) >> perf/space_leaks space_leak_001 [stat too good] >> (hpc,optasm,dyn,optllvm) >> polykinds T6068 [bad stderr] (ghci) >> rts T7919 [exit code non-0] >> (normal,hpc,optasm,threaded1,threaded2,optllvm) >> th/TH_import_loop TH_import_loop [bad stdout or stderr] (ghci) >> typecheck/should_run T7861 [bad stderr] >> (normal,hpc,optasm,threaded1,threaded2,dyn,optllvm) >> typecheck/should_run T7861 [bad stdout or stderr] (ghci) >> >> On Nov 14, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Christiaan Baaij <christiaan.ba...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> After fixing the warning in the C-code of the primitive package, validate >>> (including dph tests) seems to be working for me: >>> >>> OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Thu Nov 14 11:03:26 2013 CET >>> 0:46:34 spent to go through >>> 3818 total tests, which gave rise to >>> 14930 test cases, of which >>> 11445 were skipped >>> >>> 28 had missing libraries >>> 3394 expected passes >>> 58 expected failures >>> >>> 0 caused framework failures >>> 1 unexpected passes >>> 4 unexpected failures >>> >>> Unexpected passes: >>> ghci/linking T3333 (normal) >>> >>> Unexpected failures: >>> driver static001 [bad stderr] (normal) >>> driver/T3007 T3007 [bad exit code] (normal) >>> perf/compiler T3064 [stat not good enough] (normal) >>> perf/compiler T4801 [stat too good] (normal) >>> >>> I'll try again with a 'make maintainer-clean', include profiling libs, and >>> do a ./validate --slow. >>> >>> >>> On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:23 AM, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonw...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Ben has an excellent point: >>>> >>>> if things are broken on mac, lets fix it! Especially since we should be >>>> hitting RC status shortly.... any breakages should be smashed ASAP. >>>> >>>> This does raise a point I hope we'll address more aggressively after the >>>> 7.8 release, namely trying to keep ghc less broken by default! GHC being >>>> really really really broken between releases is probably the single HUGEST >>>> barrier to more people getting involved in helping GHC dev. And I think >>>> thats a huge problem we need to take more seriously. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Ben Lippmeier <b...@ouroborus.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 13/11/2013, at 8:02 PM, Christiaan Baaij wrote: >>>> >>>>> Does validate work for the DPH packages on Linux? >>>> >>>> "sh validate" runs fine on my Linux machine, but neither of my Macs. >>>> >>>> I can also run the dph tests manually on Linux, and they work fine. >>>> >>>> Ben. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ghc-devs mailing list >>>> ghc-devs@haskell.org >>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
