Excellent, thank you. We should really fix the 32bit performance numbers too I think, based on what we discussed on IRC earlier. Would you like to submit a patch for that too please? You can find the numbers in testsuite/tests/perf/haddock/all.T.
Also, is there any new documentation we should need for this? Is all the new stuff properly documented somewhere? Etc. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/01/14 21:20, Austin Seipp wrote: >> For the record and other people reading - after a quick discussion on >> IRC, it simply looks like the 32-bit peak_megabytes_allocated numbers >> for those tests probably weren't updated at the same time as the 64bit >> ones, leaving them out of date. >> > > I have now validated GHC with the new Haddock stuff in place. You can > see the new log at [1]. The end result is the same as validation on a > tree without changes: same 8 tests failing. > > I have also built and ran Haddock's own tests with HEAD and they now all > check out. The branch at [2] should now be ready to be merged into > upstream Haddock. If someone could merge that in, that'd be great. This > is the new parser which contains few bug fixes. We have more changes > than this which include user-visible features and new documentation. > > I'll prepare and validate those for you tomorrow and bother you some more. > > Let me know if anything needs changing. > > Thanks! > > [1]: http://fuuzetsu.co.uk/misc/validateloghaddock > [2]: https://github.com/sol/haddock/tree/new-parser > > -- > Mateusz K. > -- Regards, Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
