| Perhaps already as part of such a feedback round/bikeshedding | opportunity, I'm wondering if I'm the only one who finds the name | "TypeHoles" confusing, since as far as I understand, the extension | enables holes in *expressions*, not types... I would personally find | something like TypedHoles (note the added d) or ExpressionHoles or | something similar more intuitive.
I certainly don't mind adding "TypedHoles" as a synonym, use it in the user manual, and deprecate TypeHoles (and remove it later). If (a) no one objects and (b) someone wants to send a patch. Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of | Dominique Devriese | Sent: 13 January 2014 12:56 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Enable TypeHoles by default? | | Perhaps already as part of such a feedback round/bikeshedding | opportunity, I'm wondering if I'm the only one who finds the name | "TypeHoles" confusing, since as far as I understand, the extension | enables holes in *expressions*, not types... I would personally find | something like TypedHoles (note the added d) or ExpressionHoles or | something similar more intuitive. Not that I have strong feelings about | this, though... Note that I haven't actually tried the extension yet, | but from the description, it seems like a very nice addition to GHC, so | kudos to whoever did the work... | | Regards, | Dominique | | 2014/1/13 Richard Eisenberg <e...@cis.upenn.edu>: | > Maybe I'm missing something here, but how does specifying TypeHoles | make GHC not compliant with Haskell 2010? Turning on TypeHoles should | change only error messages. The set of programs that compile (and their | meanings) should remain unchanged, by my understanding. | > | > I'm mildly in favor of this change, but I agree that perhaps a | conversation on the users list and/or waiting a cycle isn't a bad idea. | > | > Richard | > | > On Jan 13, 2014, at 4:51 AM, Simon Marlow <marlo...@gmail.com> wrote: | > | >> On 12/01/2014 22:56, Krzysztof Gogolewski wrote: | >>> I propose to enable -XTypeHoles in GHC by default. | >> | >> GHC supports strict Haskell 2010 by default, and enabling any | extensions breaks that property. That's why we don't have any | extensions on by default. | >> | >> Cheers, | >> Simon | >> _______________________________________________ | >> ghc-devs mailing list | >> ghc-devs@haskell.org | >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs | > | > _______________________________________________ | > ghc-devs mailing list | > ghc-devs@haskell.org | > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs | _______________________________________________ | ghc-devs mailing list | ghc-devs@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs