Thanks. That'll let me make it clearer in my patches to work around the this on my side that the source of the workarounds is the changes to the template-haskell package.
-Edward On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvrie...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 2014-03-23 at 04:40:14 +0100, Richard Eisenberg wrote: > > On Mar 22, 2014, at 9:05 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote: > >> Is there a reason why the Template Haskell version wasn't bumped > >> after this change? > > > > No -- I just didn't think of it. I won't have time in the next few > > days to do this (and validate, etc.), but I'll make this change soon. > > Fyi, I went ahead and bumped to template-haskell to 2.10.0.0, fixed up > libraries/dph, and since ./validate still passed, I pushed the version > bump. > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
