Hello all, As an updated, I'm looking into the report Mateusz had of 'free' failing to build haddocks on OS X*, which I've reproduced. It seems nasty - I'll follow up with details ASAP.
* See his recent email to ghc-devs about this problem. On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25/03/14 17:09, kyra wrote: >> On 3/25/2014 20:52, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote: >>> The only instances of Haddock becoming really slow that I can think of >>> is some rather old ticket (#101 on Haddock Trac) in presence of Template >>> Haskell but I have closed it a while ago due to lack of information to >>> go on and inability to replicate without the reporter's help. Perhaps >>> this was your use case? >>> >> Aha, this is why I could not reproduce it! I checked it on packages >> which used no TH, and that slow behaviour occurred when TH was involved! >> >> I think it is TH which really triggers producing and splitting of an >> assembly output and in this case no-splitting gives *huge* benefit. >> Sadly, I have no time to check this right now. >> >> Regards, >> Kyra >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ghc-devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >> > > There's no rush as it's not going to get into 7.8.1 anyway but I would > love to see some numbers before 7.8.2 so please keep us in mind. > > Thanks! > > -- > Mateusz K. > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > -- Regards, Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
