That moment when spammers start pushing language research forward by generating functions from natural language specifications.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Artyom Kazak <y...@artyom.me> wrote: > Look what I've found: http://codecha.org/ . It might be an easy solution > to the Haskell-specific CAPTCHA problem. > > On 04/07/2014 06:53 PM, Daniel Trstenjak wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:27:32PM +0700, Kim-Ee Yeoh wrote: >> >>> What if we replace captcha with a short, static question, the web form >>> equivalent of a secret handshake? And give it enough weighting to >>> override >>> akismet? >>> >>> E.g. >>> >>> * What is Haskell's middle name? >>> * What is SPJ's middle name? >>> >> >> Yeah, I thought about something similar like: what's the result of 'map >> (+1) [1,2]'. >> >> The main drawback to this is that it'll only be a matter of time before >>> spammers wise up. But that interval might be long enough for something >>> better >>> on the horizon, e.g. akismet gets a lot smarter, better blog posts on >>> tracspam, >>> etc. >>> >> >> I don't think that the ghc wiki is of particular interest for spammers >> or that they gain a lot by understanding Haskell specifics. Most likely >> they will never notice it. >> >> >> Greetings, >> Daniel >> _______________________________________________ >> ghc-devs mailing list >> ghc-devs@haskell.org >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >> >> _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs