On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 17:30 +1000, Sophie Taylor wrote: > Hi everyone. > > > I am working on a proposal for some additions to the base library and > some modifications to GHC in the same style as the do notation support > for Applicatives. It is still very much a work in progress, but any > input/constructive criticism would be greatly appreciated; this is the > first one of these I've written. > > > Here is the proposal in its current > form: http://blog.spacekitteh.moe/posts/new-monoidal-cats.html
Hi Sophie, In your proposal draft, I am missing the rationale part. Do we need *all* of these classes in base in order to desugar proc? Can you demonstrate why they are needed? Or will something simpler suffice? Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
