I am trying to avoid having a type parameter for DynFlags, and so far the only thing that needs it is the hooks. I am currently working it through without hooks in DynFlags, and when I have something concrete I will ask againfor suggestions.
I just wanted an initial test of the waters to make sure there was no a priori reason not to do it. On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:09 AM, GHC <ghc-devs@haskell.org> wrote: > #9628: Add Annotations to the AST to simplify source to source conversions > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > Reporter: alanz | Owner: alanz > Type: feature | Status: new > request | Milestone: > Priority: normal | Version: 7.8.3 > Component: Compiler | Keywords: > Resolution: | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple > Operating System: | Difficulty: Unknown > Unknown/Multiple | Blocked By: > Type of failure: | Related Tickets: > None/Unknown | > Test Case: | > Blocking: | > Differential Revisions: | > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > > Comment (by simonpj): > > You'll need to be much more explicit before anyone is likely to venture an > opinion. What is the impact of "managed separately"? What is the > motivation for making a change at all? > > -- > Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9628#comment:10> > GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> > The Glasgow Haskell Compiler >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
