On 2014-10-06 at 11:50:03 +0200, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > On 6 Oct 2014, at 10:28, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > >> As I'm not totally sure what you mean: Assuming we already had decided >> years ago to follow LTS-style, given GHC 7.0, 7.2, 7.4, 7.6, 7.8 and the >> future 7.10; which of those GHC versions would you have been considered >> a LTS version? > > > We continue to use 7.2, at least partly because all newer versions of > ghc have had significant bugs that affect us. In fact, 7.2.2 also has > a show-stopping bug, but we patched it ourselves to create our very > own custom ghc-7.2.3 distribution.
I'd like to point out that's kinda ironic, as of *all* the GHC releases, you had to stay on the one major release that was considered a non-proper tech-preview... :-) Cheers, hvr _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs