Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2014, 03:05 -0400 schrieb David Feuer: > Just for the heck of it, I tried out an implementation of scanl using > Joachim Breitner's magical oneShot primitive. Using the test > > [..] > > with -O2 (NOT disabling Call Arity) the Core from barB is really, > really beautiful: it's small, there are no lets or local lambdas, and > everything is completely unboxed. This is much better than the result > of barA, which has a local let, and which doesn't seem to manage to > unbox anything. I cannot reproduce this here. In fact, I get identical core in both cases. Only when I do pass -fno-call-arity, A gets bad code, while B is still good. Maybe your example is too small? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nome...@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nome...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
