does asciidoc have a formal grammar/syntax or whatever? i'm trying to look
up one, but can't seem to find it.


On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvrie...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 2014-10-08 at 10:49:33 +0200, Jan Stolarek wrote:
> >> Therefore I'd like to hear your opinion on migrating away from the
> >> current Docbook XML markup to some other similarly expressive but yet
> >> more lightweight markup documentation system such as Asciidoc[1] or
> >> ReST/Sphinx[2].
>
> > My opinion is that I don't really care. I only edit the User Guide
> > once every couple of months or so. I don't have problems with Docbook
> > but if others want something else I can adjust.
>
> I'd argue, that casual contributions may benefit significantly from
> switching to a more human-friendly markup, as my theory is that it's
> much easier to pick-up a syntax that's much closer to plain-text rather
> than a fully-fledged Docbook XML. With a closer-to-plain-text syntax you
> can more easily focus on the content you want to write rather than being
> distracted by the incidental complexity of writing low-level XML markup.
>
> Or put differently, I believe or rather hope this may lower the
> barrier-to-entry for casual User's Guide contributions.
>
>
> Fwiw, I stumbled over the slide-deck (obviously dogfooded in Asciidoc)
>
>
> http://mojavelinux.github.io/decks/discover-zen-writing-asciidoc/cojugs201305/index.html
>
> which tries to make the point that Asciidoc helps you focus more on
> writing content rather than fighting with the markup, including a
> comparision of the conciseness of a chosen example of Asciidoc vs. the
> resulting Docbook XML it is converted into.
>
>
> Cheers,
>   hvr
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to