On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:52:53 -0500 Austin Seipp <aus...@well-typed.com> wrote:
> I won't repeat what's on the wiki page too much, but the TL;DR version > is: we should start packaging a version of LLVM, and shipping it with > e.g. binary distributions of GHC. It's just a lot better for everyone. > > I know we're normally fairly hesitant about things like this (shipping > external dependencies), but I think it's the only sane thing to do > here, and the situation is fairly unique in that it's not actually > very complicated to implement or support, I think. That makes a lot of sense! Gentoo allows user upgrade llvm and ghc independently, which makes syncing harder. Thus Gentoo does not care much about llvm support in ghc. -- Sergei
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
