Agreed. For example, the HTTP standard has moved away from X-prefixed headers for similar reasons.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Jan Stolarek <jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl> wrote: > > What about standardizing on an 'experimental' prefix such as > -fx-use-rpaths > > or -fx-kill-oneshot? These flags would not be added to the user guide and > > their intent clear when actually using them. > As already stated in an earlier reply I think we should have documentation > for the sake of other > developers. > > I don't like the idea of separate prefix for experimental flags. This > could be problematic when > the flag becomes stable - we would have to change its name and that would > break backwards > compatibility. > > Janek > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
