ghci also accepts a number of other things. You can define data types, type synonyms, classes, instances, so pattern synonyms would seem to fall into scope.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Dr. ERDI Gergo <ge...@erdi.hu> wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Carter Schonwald wrote: > > Hey all,I was trying to define some pattern synonyms in ghci recently, >> and that doesnt >> seem to work. Is that something slated to be fix in 7.10 or something? >> > > I thought GHCi accepts things that would be valid in a 'do' section? So > e.g. > > x = () > > doesn't work in GHCi, but > > let x = () > > does. > > Pattern synonyms don't work for the exact same reason: they are not valid > inside a 'do' block. > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
