dont forget you can vote for more than one!
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Austin Seipp <aus...@well-typed.com> wrote: > > Hi *, > > Everyone has been working hard getting things ready for the branch/RC > later this week - and that's really appreciated! As always, GHC > wouldn't be what it is without you. > > But it's the holidays - that's stressful for some, and real time > consuming for others. So to keep things light and a little > interesting, and if you have a minute as an experiment, I'd like to > ask you all something: > > What naming conventions should we use for GHC buildbots? We've been > adding more bots recently, and we've just gotten hold of some new > hardware this week. > > Currently, GHC buildbots don't have any reserved name or identifier, > or DNS entries. I'd like to change that - we mostly refer to them by > IP, but this is annoying A) to remember and B) to tell other people. > We'll likely begin to lease out these machines to developers so they > can test and debug - meaning they'll be mentioned more. > > I'd like to propose a theme for naming buildbots - this theme would be > used to populate DNS entries under the *.ghc.haskell.org domain. > > The question is: what naming convention do we use? > > So I created a poll for this. You can see that poll and vote for your > favorite options on Phabricator: > > - https://phabricator.haskell.org/V3 > > It's an approval vote rather than a plurality; so feel free to select > multiple choices. The winner with the most votes will get selected. > > Note: the selection of options is relatively random and pre-selected; > there is an upper limit on the number of choices - 10 max - so I > merely picked some categories I thought would work and be generic > enough. > > I imagine this vote will be open for about a week or so. I'd like it > if developers could vote on their favorites, or simply leave comments > on the vote for further suggestion - we could institute a vote with > better names. > > Thanks all - and be sure to have happy holidays. > > P.S I did not know RFC 1178 existed before today. Seems like there's > one for everything... > > -- > Regards, > > Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant > Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
