On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Reid Barton <rwbar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:34 AM, George Colpitts < >> george.colpi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> cabal install *--allow-newer=base* accelerate >>> >> >> Never safe, because base contains the runtime and the runtime and the >> compiler are very tightly tied together. Crashes are not surprising. >> > > Actually it should always be safe: --allow-newer=base is essentially the > equivalent of removing the upper bound on base from the .cabal file (of > every package that was installed during that run). > > However, I'm quite confused about something, namely that as far as I can > tell, neither accelerate nor any of its dependencies contain a module > Data.Label.Base. What package was GHC trying to build when it crashed? > Oops, I was running the wrong command: it's in fclabels. Please file a bug report and attach the output of `cabal install --ghc-options=-v fclabels`, thanks! Regards, Reid Barton
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
