Thank you kindly for the great introduction. I hope I can be helpful here.
On Feb 16, 2015 7:47 AM, "Mikolaj Konarski" <[email protected]> wrote: > Resending, since Roman's and Kyril's email addresses were mangled/missing. > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Simon Peyton Jones > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Darren > > > > > > > > Excellent! We have a Windows Task Force, consisting roughly of the folk > in > > cc. So they would be the first group to ask. > > > > > > > > (I think it would be very helpful to have a Windows Task Force home > page, so > > that it’s easier to find the group.) > > > > > > > > thanks for helping with Windows. > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > From: ghc-devs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Darren > > Grant > > Sent: 15 February 2015 07:36 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Resolving Windows 64-bit linker issues > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I notice there are a series of related long-standing issues subject to > > particular cygwin64 quirks, and I'd like to offer time to help resolve > these > > if possible > > > > At this point I've had some exposure to the GHC build process (7.8.3), > and > > have poked around the GHC linker to gain some low level insight. > > > > > > > > Would anyone be available to fill me in on the current state of affairs > with > > mingw64 GHCi linking? For instance, is there ongoing work, or perhaps a > > preferred direction but no available developer bandwidth to proceed? > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Darren > > > > >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
