On 06/27/2015 11:33 AM, Niklas Larsson wrote: > Hi! > > Instead of trying to minimally patch the existing API and still > breaking loads of code, why not make a new API that doesn't have > to compromise and depreciate the old one? >
This is a good idea in theory, but it's how we end up in situations like https://xkcd.com/927/ :) Regards, _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs