I was reviewing some history here, and I realized that the GHCJS folks had previous implemented this:
https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2015-November/010478.html What ever happened to this line of work? Does remote GHCi subsume it? Edward Excerpts from Simon Marlow's message of 2015-11-17 02:10:55 -0800: > Hi folks - I've been thinking about changing the way we run interpreted > code so that it would be run in a separate process. It turns out this > has quite a few benefits, and would let us kill some of the really > awkward hacks we have in GHC to work around problems that arise because > we're running interpreted code and the compiler on the same runtime. > > I summarised the idea here: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/RemoteGHCi > > I'd be interested to hear if anyone has any thoughts around this, > particularly if doing this would make your life difficult in some way. > Are people relying on dynCompileExpr for anything? > > Cheers, > Simon _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs