Christopher

Improving error message is an excellent goal, and one that I have spent more 
hours on than I care to tell you.

If you have a particular one in mind, could you open a Trac ticket with a 
particular reproducible test case, the error message you get, and the error 
message you’d like to get.

Thanks

Simon

From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Christopher 
Allen
Sent: 03 March 2016 07:55
To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Specialized type hints

I'd like to see how warm people would be to catching GHC's type error quality 
up a bit.

I did a write-up on a confusion a reader of our book had:

https://gist.github.com/bitemyapp/c27c721b92dab0248433<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fgist.github.com%2fbitemyapp%2fc27c721b92dab0248433&data=01%7c01%7csimonpj%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7c64d227da349847f85fe308d343391dbb%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=EtjujRikMvoUN%2fBq6RtOrotsPdXdvZggnMU3Cu2BypE%3d>

This is not new. A lot of people complain about this particular type error in 
particular when they say GHC has bad type errors. I don't think GHC's type 
errors are bad, but I do think they could be improved and this particular issue 
has an unfortunate source to sink distance.

I would rather type error improvements not be buried behind a "silly beginners 
only" flag and that they just be part of improving the UX for everyone. With 
that proviso, how likely would specialized type error hints and some general 
error message fix ups be regarded?

By specialized I mean, "detect that they tried to find an instance of Num for 
(-> something something) and suggest that they did the wrong thing, with 
possible fixes: X Y Z". Ideally before the "hey do you want FlexibleContexts?!" 
thing fires.

I do not think I am capable of doing this, but being able to zoom in, clang 
style, to the expression where they are (probably accidentally) using a 
function like a Num or a Num like a function would be pretty valuable so they 
don't have to guess-n-check parenthesize their code.


--
Chris Allen
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to