Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 31.03.2016, 14:56 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones: > Joachim > > Harbormaster seems to be saying that GHC’s perf got a lot worse > > https://phabricator.haskell.org/harbormaster/ > > after Buildable 9015, which omitted the oneshot info. The > typechecker seems to allocate a lot more. > > That is not good. Revert and investigate?
yes, I noticed as well, and perf.haskell.org has now also confirmed this. Just pushed a reversal. But I wonder what went wrong when I ran ./validate --slow locally. Can we please have harbormaster builds of DRs back? I felt just so much more secure about pushing when the commits were checked by a more reliable party than me. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner [email protected] • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: [email protected] • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
