err, i mean, sphinx was giving checking for version of sphinx-build... Sphinx (sphinx-build) 1.4.1 ./configure: line 9698: test: Sphinx (sphinx-build) 1: integer expression expected
which version of sphinx for which python are we supposed to use? On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Carter Schonwald < [email protected]> wrote: > looks like i dont have dblatex setup on that build machine, fixing that > now! (slightly trick on mac) > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Carter Schonwald < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> i'm running into some confusions with getting docs built correclty / not >> generating the pdfs and html assets i expect, i'll share an updated sha etc >> when i track that down >> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 9:52 AM, George Colpitts < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> retrying with >>> >>> ./configure --with-nm=$(xcode-select >>> -p)/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/nm-classic >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 10:49 AM George Colpitts < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Carter. I'm not so concerned with obtaining a working build. I'd >>>> like to be able to build with the Apple toolchain. I assume there are other >>>> developers who feel the same. >>>> >>>> Can you elaborate on the "path to nm classic is wrong" ? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> George >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 10:42 AM Carter Schonwald < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've a working build I'll circulate >>>>> Also that path to nm classic is wrong. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Saturday, April 23, 2016, George Colpitts < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm having problems using the Apple toolchain to build this on Mac >>>>>> OS. Has anybody succeeded with the Apple toolchain? >>>>>> >>>>>> First I get the error: >>>>>> >>>>>> broken 'nm' detected, see https://ghc.haskell.org/ticket/11744. >>>>>> Workaround: You may want to pass '--with-nm=nm-classic' to >>>>>> 'configure'. >>>>>> >>>>>> but after I try that workaround I get: >>>>>> >>>>>> inplace/bin/deriveConstants --gen-header -o >>>>>> includes/dist-derivedconstants/header/DerivedConstants.h --tmpdir >>>>>> includes/dist-derivedconstants/header/ --gcc-program "/usr/bin/gcc" >>>>>> --gcc-flag -Wall --gcc-flag -Wno-unknown-pragmas --gcc-flag -m64 >>>>>> --gcc-flag >>>>>> -fno-stack-protector --gcc-flag -Iincludes --gcc-flag -Iincludes/dist >>>>>> --gcc-flag -Iincludes/dist-derivedconstants/header --gcc-flag >>>>>> -Iincludes/dist-ghcconstants/header --gcc-flag -Irts --gcc-flag -fcommon >>>>>> --nm-program "nm-classic" --target-os "darwin" >>>>>> deriveConstants: nm-classic: readCreateProcess: >>>>>> runInteractiveProcess: exec: does not exist (No such file or directory) >>>>>> make[1]: *** >>>>>> [includes/dist-derivedconstants/header/DerivedConstants.h] Error 1 >>>>>> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>>>>> make: *** [all] Error 2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> George >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:27 AM Ben Gamari <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> tl;dr: If you would like to produce a binary distribution for GHC >>>>>>> 8.0.1-rc4 then let us know, grab the source distribution and >>>>>>> start building. The binary distributions will be all released >>>>>>> one >>>>>>> week from today. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello GHC packagers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am happy to announce the release of the 8.0.1-rc4 source >>>>>>> distribution >>>>>>> to binary packagers. This release should resolve all of the issues >>>>>>> noted >>>>>>> in the release candidate 3 announcement. You will find the usual >>>>>>> artifacts at >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.0.1-rc4/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For this candidate we are again following our new release policy [1], >>>>>>> with a one-week delay between the release of the source and binary >>>>>>> distributions. The goal of this policy is to give all platforms the >>>>>>> opportunity for support from the first day of a release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If all of the expected binary releases are submitted before the >>>>>>> week-long delay has elapsed, we will move forward with the release of >>>>>>> the binaries on an accelerated schedule. It would be appreciated if >>>>>>> you >>>>>>> could reply to this message confirming that you intend to offer a >>>>>>> binary >>>>>>> distribution this release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Otherwise, let either Austin or I know if you have any trouble >>>>>>> building >>>>>>> your distribution. I have yet to push the ghc-8.0.1-rc4 tag in case >>>>>>> we >>>>>>> encounter unexpected issues but all of my builds with this tarball >>>>>>> thusfar have gone quite well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Good luck and thanks for all of your work! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Ben >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>> https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2016-March/011546.html >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> ghc-devs mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
