I am just seeing it on harbourmaster. https://phabricator.haskell.org/harbormaster/build/12730/?l=100
Matt On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Ömer Sinan Ağacan <omeraga...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ugh. I validated that patch before committing and validated many times after > that patch. Are you using a 32bit system? Maybe we should bump the numbers for > 32bit builds too. > > I'm hesitant to mark the test broken because I'm afraid that the numbers will > increase if we stop testing for allocations/residency completely. I think > temporarily bumping numbers is better than temporarily disabling it. > > What are the numbers you're getting? > > 2016-08-17 14:16 GMT+00:00 Matthew Pickering <matthewtpicker...@gmail.com>: >> Hi all, >> >> https://phabricator.haskell.org/rGHC773e3aadac4bbee9a0173ebc90ffdc9458a2a3a9 >> >> broke the build by re-enabling the test T1969 >> >> The ticket tracking this is: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12437 >> >> Omer: Is it best to revert this patch and mark the test broken again? >> >> Matt _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
