Hi, Am Dienstag, den 06.12.2016, 17:14 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari: > Joachim Breitner <m...@joachim-breitner.de> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Am Dienstag, den 06.12.2016, 19:27 +0000 schrieb Michal Terepeta: > > > (isn't that's what perf.haskell.org is doing?) > > > > for compiler performance, it only reports the test suite perf test > > number so far. > > > > If someone modifies the nofib runner to give usable timing results for > > the compiler, I can easily track these numbers as well. > > > > I have a module [1] that does precisely this for the PITA project (which > I still have yet to put up on a public server; I'll try to make time for > this soon).
Are you saying that the compile time measurements of a single run of the compiler are actually useful? I’d expect we first have to make nofib call the compiler repeatedly. Also, shouldn’t this then become part of nofib-analye? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: nome...@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nome...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
