On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Ben Gamari <b...@smart-cactus.org> wrote:
> Carter Schonwald <carter.schonw...@gmail.com> writes: > > > No matter *how* ghc ultimately bundles simd for high level > > programming, it *will* have to bottom out into these target specific > > operations at code gen time, and LLVM is *not* an abstraction for it. > > > I am very interested to hear what you mean by this; please do elaborate. > I'm a bit puzzled by this, as this is pretty much the exact kind of abstraction LLVM is intended for as I understand it. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs