On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Ben Gamari <b...@smart-cactus.org> wrote:

> Carter Schonwald <carter.schonw...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > No matter *how* ghc ultimately bundles simd for high level
> > programming, it *will* have to bottom out into these target specific
> > operations at code gen time, and LLVM is *not* an abstraction for it.
> >
> I am very interested to hear what you mean by this; please do elaborate.
>

I'm a bit puzzled by this, as this is pretty much the exact kind of
abstraction LLVM is intended for as I understand it.

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com                                  ballb...@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to