It's the same convention as with other Semigroup-like functions, such as `foldl1`, `scanl1`, etc. Doesn't really makes sense to distinguish between `cycle` and `cycle1` in this case, but that's just bike shedding.
Also, at some point in the future, `cycle` can go in `Data.OldList` and be replaced by `cycle1`, renamed accordingly. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Wolfgang Jeltsch <wolfgang...@jeltsch.info > wrote: > Am Montag, den 11.09.2017, 06:55 +0530 schrieb Harendra Kumar: > > On 11 September 2017 at 02:46, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2017, 10:39 +0200 schrieb Herbert Valerio > > > Riedel: > > > > What you seem to be searching for looks more like what we know as > > > > `cycle :: [a] -> [a]`, and in fact there is its generalisation at > > > > > > > > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.10.0.0/docs/ > Data-Semigroup.html#v:cycle1 > > > > > > Why is this function called cycle1, not cycle? What does the “1” > > > stand for? > > > > I guess this is not named "cycle" to avoid conflict with > > "Data.List.cycle". > > Why? We have qualified imports. It seems very wrong to add single > characters to identifiers to denote name spaces. > > > I was also wondering why it is "cycle1" instead of, say "scycle". It > > can be thought of as cycling just one value instead of cycling a list > > in case of "Data.List.cycle". > > Also Data.List.cycle cycles only one value. It is just that this single > value happens to be a list. If you specialize cycle1 to the list monoid, > you get exactly Data.List.cycle. > > All the best, > Wolfgang > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs